Query Wall .

Sigma 24-105 Vs Canon 24-105

Written by Aug 08, 2022 · 3 min read
Sigma 24-105 Vs Canon 24-105

Since there isn't much difference in iq between the two canon lenses the same probably holds for the ii version. From the reviews i’ve read, the mark ii version is only a marginal improvement, at best, to the original.

Sigma 24-105 Vs Canon 24-105. From the reviews i’ve read, the mark ii version is only a marginal improvement, at best, to the original. The sigma has a higher mm (0.30x vs 0.24) to its advantage.

Review Canon L 24-105Mm Vs Sigma Art 24-105Mm - Youtube
Review Canon L 24-105Mm Vs Sigma Art 24-105Mm - Youtube from www.youtube.com
Canon is weather sealed, sigma is not. Reviews and tests show the sigma is sharper at 24mm, canon is sharper at 105mm, similar in mid range. Sigma is slightly heavier, has smoother operation.

Generally, that results in a smoother look and better bokeh.

Reviews and tests show the sigma is sharper at 24mm, canon is sharper at 105mm, similar in mid range. Generally, that results in a smoother look and better bokeh. Canon is weather sealed, sigma is not. If you don’t need weather sealing, the sigma is a much better choice.

Since there isn't much difference in iq between the two canon lenses the same probably holds for the ii version. The sigma has a higher mm (0.30x vs 0.24) to its advantage. In the corners at 24mm, the rf lens is sharper between f/4 and f/5.6 and maintains a marginal advantage up to f/11 and beyond. Reviews and tests show the sigma is sharper at 24mm, canon is sharper at 105mm, similar in mid range.

In the corners at 24mm, the rf lens is sharper between f/4 and f/5.6 and maintains a marginal advantage up to f/11 and beyond.

The sigma lens is built like a tank, is butter smooth to operate and build quality is excellent. Reviews and tests show the sigma is sharper at 24mm, canon is sharper at 105mm, similar in mid range. At 35mm, the rf outperforms the ef lens at all values up until f/22, with the biggest difference being visible from f/4 to f/8. Canon is weather sealed, sigma is not.

Canon is weather sealed, sigma is not.

Canon is weather sealed, sigma is not. Reviews and tests show the sigma is sharper at 24mm, canon is sharper at 105mm, similar in mid range. Canon focuses slightly faster, sigma might be more accurate. Has a silent focus motor built into the lens.

From the reviews i’ve read, the mark ii version is only a marginal improvement, at best, to the original.

If you don’t need weather sealing, the sigma is a much better choice. You just click a check box, and it corrects at least vignetting, barrel distortion, and pincushion distortion. Canon focuses slightly faster, sigma might be more accurate. Canon is weather sealed, sigma is not.

In the corners at 24mm, the rf lens is sharper between f/4 and f/5.6 and maintains a marginal advantage up to f/11 and beyond. Canon focuses slightly faster, sigma might be more accurate. Generally, that results in a smoother look and better bokeh. In the corners at 24mm, the rf lens is sharper between f/4 and f/5.6 and maintains a marginal advantage up to f/11 and beyond.

Read next

"Canton Mill Lofts"

May 01 . 3 min read

Canon 70 200 F4 Usm Sample Photos

May 09 . 3 min read

Alden Castle

Jan 05 . 3 min read

Wedding Bands For Mechanics

Apr 09 . 3 min read

Leica M9 Frame Lines

May 19 . 4 min read